Skip to content

Who publishes this · What it is for

About Ridgeburn Press

Ridgeburn Press is a public-interest evidence platform about a proposed 1,200-dwelling development at Arrow Junction, Queenstown Lakes District. We are not neutral about the proposal. We are strict about the evidence — because that is what makes the case hold.

The He Tohu document room at the National Library of New Zealand, Wellington, which holds He Whakaputanga, Te Tiriti o Waitangi and the Women's Suffrage Petition

Ridgeburn Press exists to show what rapid development at this scale would do to Arrow Junction and the surrounding district — the traffic, the wastewater, the nitrogen, the night sky, the landscape — by putting the real documents and the real figures in one place and letting readers reach their own conclusion.

We take a side. The proposal would place 1,200 dwellings at a rural junction, generate roughly 3,000 vehicle movements a day across SH6, Gibbston Valley Road and the Crown Range Road approach, and produce in the order of one million litres of wastewater every day, carrying an annual nitrogen load recorded in the application material as 2.8 tonnes. We think those consequences are serious, and we say so. What we do not do is overstate them.

The discipline, in four lines

Every figure is traceable to a document, or it is labelled as not yet sourced.

Every claim carries a classification that says what kind of thing it is.

No adverse statement about a named person or company is published without a source link.

Anyone described here may reply in full, and the reply is published unedited.

An opponent’s easiest win is one unsourced sentence that discredits everything around it. These disciplines exist to deny them that. They are published in full at How We Classify Evidence, and the response mechanism is published at Corrections & Right of Response.

Everything on this site

There is no footer link list on this platform, so this index is the complete map. It is grouped the way the underlying brief is grouped.

Start here

  • What Ridgeburn Would Do — the scale, the harm, and the order in which to read it.
  • The Newsroom — who publishes, the editorial roles, and how the publication pipeline works.

What it would do

The record

  • The Evidence — each proposition, its evidence, the independent analysis, and the questions remaining.
  • How We Classify Evidence — all eight classifications, what each does and does not mean, and how to challenge one.
  • Expert Evidence Centre — the thirteen disciplines this application touches, and the standards any commissioned report must meet.

Process, property and decision-makers

Published as it happens

Take part

What we do not have yet

Being explicit about this is part of the standard. The day and night simulations, the interactive wastewater visualisation and the interactive title map are described on this site but are not yet built; when they ship, they will publish their assumptions before their pictures. No expert has been instructed, so no expert is named. Several document references still carry [Source to be added] because the citation has not been attached, and several questions carry [Awaiting client evidence] because the material has been requested and not yet supplied. Those labels are deliberate, and they are meant to shrink.

Contact and correction

If anything here is wrong, tell us and we will fix it in public. Ridgeburn Limited, Queenstown Lakes District Council, any councillor, and any person or body named on this site has a standing right of reply. How to respond.

Evidence first

Every number on this site comes from a document in the record, or is labelled as an estimate. We would rather publish a gap honestly than fill it persuasively.

Sourced and labelled

Eight classifications, applied consistently, so a reader always knows whether they are looking at a primary document, an applicant claim, an estimate, or an open question.

Right of reply

Anyone named here may respond, and the response is published unedited alongside what prompted it. Corrections are published as corrections, never quietly amended.

Our standing promise

We argue against this development. We do not overstate it, we do not guess at anyone’s motives, and where the record is silent we say so.

Ridgeburn Press editorial standard · Eight classifications · Published in full

Correct us, or exercise a right of reply

Your reaction

How did this land with you?

A yes/no can't carry how you feel — pick the face that does. Every reaction is counted — we'll check it's you with a quick email code.

0 reactions recorded